loyalty and love
been years, i subscribed to the newspaper "faith" and in particular the section philosophy and religion. i kept my faith thanks to the newspaper, even though i lost my credit in this society.
so i turn back to myself and wonder how it happens that i am less loyal than i should be. wether that is so irrelevant, it's more the feeling - or is it to know for sure in my conscience - that i have of myself as a good catholic?
that newspaper provokes to reflexion anyway. well take the word loyalty. of course it is true that the word faith itself symbolizes not much given the fact that the word faith is almost always associated with "until death" and "forever".
so faith by itself seems to be insufficient and meaningless. it is only that it gets its meaning after a long period of time. loyalty has yet to be proven and therefore it has no identity as such and therefore may have no name (cv)
furthermore, the word is always used in combination with "sincerity" and " to swear". faith is not credible if one not swears and the epithet is certainly not a true ornans and denigrates the ordinary or common allegiance to something sneaky.
as a pronoun, a pronoun, a word that stands for something, not least because this word has a solemnity, a prominent word. also the word has something of the almost inaccessible, it is almost impossible.
as a noun, not a word with a name (famous) but certainly a word that can exist independently on its own say. fidelity as marriage, a true alliance of the marriage. so-called marriages on the contrary .. etc.
anecdotal one could philosophy about the gender of the words, because faith can be male or female, "echt" is male and marriage is neuter. it could be related to houwendatlijck? (lick or lijck = dance alternatively: beat that corps ;)-
remarkable is the implicit question of doubt using the word wedding. after all, who can this cruel task to bring a good end? it is something which has not yet been proven and what still needs to be.
it has no right to exist in the present. without perseverance, faith has no meaning. the society seeks to benefit by declaring faith to real marriage ("echt"). by this alone the marriage is penalized. an extra burden as it were.
faith is therefore most probably only virtual, not least because it is sanctioned by church and state. it causes unnecessary continuous human suffering because the target hardly can be achieved here on earth.
remember: he who marries does well, but he who does not marry does better! and don’t blame in god's name no allegiance to a dog. it's bad enough that the word is used by pigs, who think they are human.
Labels: philosophy
<< Home